ArticleExperimental brain research2026
The influence of hand dominance, object distance, and size on reach-to-grasp coordination in a virtual environment.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hand dominance influences motor control, yet the nature of asymmetries in reach-to-grasp coordination remains unclear. We used an immersive, haptic-free virtual environment to examine how hand dominance, object size, and distance shape kinematics and muscle activity during reach-to-grasp actions. Twelve right-handed participants performed unilateral movements with both hands toward virtual objects varying in size and distance. Kinematic and electromyographic data were collected from transport- and grasp-related muscles. A 2 (Hand: dominant, non-dominant) × 3 (Distance: near, middle, far) × 3 (Size: small, medium, large) repeated-measures ANOVA evaluated effects on movement parameters. Transport with the non-dominant hand showed higher peak velocities and accelerations and greater variability in 3-D position compared with the dominant hand. These differences were accompanied by increased triceps brachii activation during late transport, likely reflecting compensatory deceleration and stabilization before grasp. In contrast, grasp kinematics and grasp-related electromyographic activity did not differ significantly between hands. Task parameters modulated both transport and grasp, but object distance more strongly influenced transport, whereas object size more consistently affected grasp. Reach-to-grasp coordination in virtual reality revealed functional specialization between the hands, with asymmetries evident in transport but not grasp. These findings support models proposing a proximal-distal division of motor function between limbs. The results also demonstrate the utility of haptic-free VR as a methodological tool for investigating and potentially training limb-specific motor strategies in healthy individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41553538What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.