ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Potentially inappropriate medications related to two-year progression of mild cognitive impairment and dementia.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does the drug accelerate the decline, or the decline invite the drug? Reverse causation in studies of inappropriate medications and dementia progression.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Faster dementia progression was associated with use of potentially inappropriate medications.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo document use and impact of potentially inappropriate medications on two-year progression of dementia in individuals with cognitive declines.
methodsA retrospective study of 397 patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) or dementia diagnosed and followed-up in outpatient memory clinics in Norway during 2009 − 18. Beers (2019)- and STOPP-2 criteria were used to identify Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMcogs) in individuals with cognitive impairments at baseline and two-year-follow-up. PIMcog use in terms of dementia severity, cognitive function, and neuropsychiatric and depressive symptoms were analyzed in regression models.
resultsThe prevalence of PIMcogs increased from 16% at baseline to 23% at follow-up. PIMcog users were more likely to be women (63.5%), and they used more drugs, with a median of 5 drugs at baseline and 4 drugs at follow-up, compared to non-users who had a median of 3 used drugs at both time points. PIMcog users had higher median Neuropsychiatric Inventory severity sum scores (6 [3.0–11.0] versus 4.0 [2.0–7.0]) and median Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia scores (6.5 [3.0–11.0] versus 4.0 [1.0–7.0]) compared to non-users at follow-up (p ≤ 0.002). PIMcog users exhibited more severe dementia, with a Clinical Dementia Rate-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) score of 7.0 (4.0–13.0) compared to 6.0 (3.5–10.0) in non-users. The median annual increase in CDR-SB was one unit, and PIMcog use at follow-up was significantly associated with more rapid progression of dementia severity.
conclusionFaster dementia progression was documented among PIMcog users although, the prevalence of PIMcogs was generally low in Norwegian memory clinic patients with cognitive impairments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.