ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
Comparative evaluation of [
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- FAPI PET/CT shows favorable potential for the evaluation of gallbladder cancer: a prospective study comparing [EJNMMI research · 2026Article
- The Heterogeneity and Function of Stromal Cells in the Tumor Microenvironment.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveBreast cancer is the most common malignancy among women and remains the leading cause of cancer-related death in this population. Radionuclide-based diagnostic and therapeutic approaches have emerged as effective and low-risk strategies for management of breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of [
methodsA total of twenty patients with clinically suspected recurrent or metastatic breast cancer were prospectively enrolled. All participants underwent both [
resultsThe total number of lesions detected by [
conclusion[
Indexed as
Identifiers
41553532What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.