ArticlePediatric radiology2026
Attenuation-based ultra-low-dose lung computed tomography at 0.1 mSv to 0.3 mSv effective dose in children.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Performance of Commercial Deep Learning-Based Radiation Dose Optimization Software in Pediatric Radiology: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadiation dose reduction is essential in paediatric lung computed tomography (CT). Advances in energy-integrating detector CT and deep-learning reconstruction may enable ultra-low-dose imaging comparable to photon-counting CT.
objectiveTo evaluate the radiation dose and performance of an ultra-low-dose lung CT protocol using a wide-detector energy-integrating CT system in paediatric patients, focusing on effective radiation dose and diagnostic image quality. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 277 low-dose lung CT scans from 106 paediatric patients (age range, 113 days to 17.85 years) were retrospectively analysed. All scans were acquired in axial mode using a 256-slice-multidetector CT scanner with deep learning image reconstruction and attenuation-based Auto Prescription. Radiation dose parameters, including volume CT dose index, dose-length product, size-specific dose estimate, and effective dose, were calculated. Signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were assessed in standardised anatomical regions. Patients were stratified by age, and statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate dose trends and image quality metrics.
resultsThere were significant differences between all age groups for all dose parameters (Kruskal-Wallis test, P<0.05). The median effective dose increased with age, ranging from 0.12 mSv (interquartile range (IQR) 0.09-0.14 mSv) in the 0-5-year group to 0.23 mSv (IQR 0.21-0.25 mSv) in adolescents aged 15 years to <18 years. Contrast-to-noise ratio and signal-to-noise ratio exhibited age-dependent variation with a small increase in older age groups. One-sided non-inferiority testing demonstrated that the signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio in the youngest age group (0-5 years) were not significantly inferior to those in the ≥15-year group (P<0.05). All examinations were deemed diagnostically sufficient by board-certified paediatric radiologists. Non-disruptive artefacts such as cardiac motion and step artefacts occurred frequently but did not impair interpretation.
conclusionsUltra-low-dose lung CT using wide-detector energy-integrating CT with deep-learning image reconstruction allows for routine diagnostic imaging in children at radiation doses ranging from 0.12 mSv to 0.23 mSv, comparable to those reported for newer photon-counting CT systems. This approach provides a robust, clinically viable strategy for minimizing radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic image quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.