Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41553412›Full record

Observational studyEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes2026

Cardiovascular risk assessment and risk factor control in patients with hypertension in Europe: the SNAPSHOT study.

Dragos Vinereanu, Miguel Camafort, Anastase Dzudie, Branislava Ivanovic, José María Mostaza, Ivan Pećin, Arman Postadzhiyan, Tamaz Shaburishvili, Julien Magne

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dragos VinereanuCardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest 020021, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9054-8779
Miguel CamafortHospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08036, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8669-6410
Anastase DzudieCardiology & Cardiac Pacing Unit, Douala General Hospital, PO Box 4856, Douala, Cameroon.
Branislava IvanovicCardiology Clinic, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade 11000, Serbia.
José María MostazaLipid and Vascular Risk Unit, Hospital La Paz-Carlos III, Madrid 28029, Spain.
Ivan PećinSchool of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.
Arman PostadzhiyanDepartment of General Medicine, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia 1431, Bulgaria.
Tamaz ShaburishviliTbilisi Heart and Vascular Clinic, Ilia State University of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Julien MagneCenter of Clinical and Research Data, Epimact Inserm 1094, IRD U270, University Hospital of Limoges, CHU de Limoges, Limoges 87000, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5290-531X

Funding

Servier
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsUnderestimated cardiovascular (CV) risk may lead to inadequate control of blood pressure (BP), LDL cholesterol, and glycated haemoglobin. This study investigated CV risk assessment and BP, LDL cholesterol, and glycated haemoglobin control among patients with hypertension in routine clinical practice. METHODS AND

resultsIn the observational, cross-sectional, epidemiological SNAPSHOT study (conducted in Bulgaria, Croatia, Georgia, Romania, Serbia, and Spain), CV risk was assessed in adults with hypertension according to the physician clinical practices, guidelines, and the risk assessment models valid when the study was performed (SCORE1 and SCORE2/SCORE2-OP). Blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, and glycated haemoglobin control rates were also assessed. Of 9307 patients (aged 65.8 ± 10.5 years, 43.1% male), most (91.3%) had ≥1 additional CV risk factor; 7610 (81.8%) had dyslipidaemia and 3097 (33.3%) had type 2 diabetes (T2D). Compared with guideline recommendations, assessment of patient CV risk by physicians, relative to the risk obtained using SCORE1 and SCORE2/SCORE2-OP, was accurate in only 38.0 and 26.7% of patients, respectively, and was underestimated in 54.3 and 71.8% of patients. Control rates of BP, LDL cholesterol, and glycated haemoglobin were suboptimal [<25%, <12% (in those with comorbid dyslipidaemia), and <50% (in those with comorbid T2D), respectively].

conclusionPhysicians from six European countries tended to overestimate control rates of BP and LDL cholesterol, while underestimating CV risk in their patients with hypertension. Overall, BP, LDL cholesterol, and glycated haemoglobin control rates were low. Better implementation of clinical guideline recommendations is needed.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHypertensionAgedBlood PressureCholesterol, LDLCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsCholesterol, LDLGlycated HemoglobinBlood pressure controlCardiovascular riskDyslipidaemiaEpidemiological studyHypertensionLDL-C control

Identifiers

PMID41553412
PMCPMC13288740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.