Observational studyEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes2026
Cardiovascular risk assessment and risk factor control in patients with hypertension in Europe: the SNAPSHOT study.
Observational study in European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsUnderestimated cardiovascular (CV) risk may lead to inadequate control of blood pressure (BP), LDL cholesterol, and glycated haemoglobin. This study investigated CV risk assessment and BP, LDL cholesterol, and glycated haemoglobin control among patients with hypertension in routine clinical practice. METHODS AND
resultsIn the observational, cross-sectional, epidemiological SNAPSHOT study (conducted in Bulgaria, Croatia, Georgia, Romania, Serbia, and Spain), CV risk was assessed in adults with hypertension according to the physician clinical practices, guidelines, and the risk assessment models valid when the study was performed (SCORE1 and SCORE2/SCORE2-OP). Blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, and glycated haemoglobin control rates were also assessed. Of 9307 patients (aged 65.8 ± 10.5 years, 43.1% male), most (91.3%) had ≥1 additional CV risk factor; 7610 (81.8%) had dyslipidaemia and 3097 (33.3%) had type 2 diabetes (T2D). Compared with guideline recommendations, assessment of patient CV risk by physicians, relative to the risk obtained using SCORE1 and SCORE2/SCORE2-OP, was accurate in only 38.0 and 26.7% of patients, respectively, and was underestimated in 54.3 and 71.8% of patients. Control rates of BP, LDL cholesterol, and glycated haemoglobin were suboptimal [<25%, <12% (in those with comorbid dyslipidaemia), and <50% (in those with comorbid T2D), respectively].
conclusionPhysicians from six European countries tended to overestimate control rates of BP and LDL cholesterol, while underestimating CV risk in their patients with hypertension. Overall, BP, LDL cholesterol, and glycated haemoglobin control rates were low. Better implementation of clinical guideline recommendations is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.