ArticleGigaScience2026
Generalizable machine learning models for rapid antimicrobial resistance prediction in unseen health care settings.
Article in GigaScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early antifungal resistance prediction based on MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Generalizable machine learning models for rapid antimicrobial resistance prediction in unseen health care settings.GigaScience · 2026Article
- From surveillance to intelligence: a scoping review of machine learning for antimicrobial resistance surveillance intelligence across One Health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe deployment of machine learning in clinical settings is often hindered by the limited generalizability of the models. Models that perform well during development tend to underperform in new environments, limiting their clinical utility. This issue affects models designed for the rapid identification of antimicrobial resistance, which is essential to guide treatment decisions. Traditional susceptibility tests can take up to 3 days, whereas integrating matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry with machine learning has the potential to reduce this to 1 day. However, model performance declines drastically in hospitals or time frames outside the training data.
resultsTo improve robustness, we develop advanced feature representations using masked autoencoders (MAEs) for MALDI-TOF spectra and chemical language models and SELF-referencing embedded strings (SELFIES) for antimicrobials. Cross-validated on data from 4 medical institutions, our models demonstrate improved performance and stability. The MAE and SELFIES encodings increase the area under the precision-recall curve by 4% when evaluated on unseen time periods, while the MAE and Molformer language model encodings improve it by 10% when applied across different hospitals.
conclusionsThese results underscore the value of combining deep learning with chemical and spectral information to build generalizable, high-impact clinical artificial intelligence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.