ArticleFEBS open bio2026
Nuclear pore links Fob1-dependent rDNA damage relocation to lifespan control.
Article in FEBS open bio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In budding yeast, the replication fork blocking protein Fob1 arrests replication forks at the ribosomal RNA gene (rDNA) locus, leading to DNA double-strand breaks that promote genomic instability and limit replicative lifespan. rDNA damage has been reported to drive exit from the nucleolus, and persistent double-strand breaks can relocate to the nuclear periphery, but how these spatial transitions are organized and how they influence genome stability and aging remain unclear. Here, we analyze the subnuclear localization of a site-specific rDNA break and its functional relationship with nuclear pores. Using quantitative fluorescence microscopy, we show that damaged rDNA accumulates at the nucleolar-nucleoplasmic interface adjacent to the nuclear envelope. This position represents the minimal movement required to leave the nucleolar interior while maintaining contact with the nuclear periphery, in a manner reminiscent of nucleolar caps of higher eukaryotes. Cells defective in nuclear pore association display pronounced rDNA instability that is largely, but not completely, suppressed by deletion of Fob1, with partial restoration of rDNA stability. Disruption of nuclear pore association also shortens replicative lifespan, and this defect is partially rescued by Fob1 deletion, indicating that nuclear pores affect longevity through both Fob1-dependent and Fob1-independent pathways. These findings refine current models of rDNA damage handling in budding yeast and support a role for nuclear pores in spatially organizing Fob1-induced rDNA damage to maintain rDNA stability and replicative lifespan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.