Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41553182›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Predicting human decision-making across task conditions via individuality transfer.

Hiroshi Higashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hiroshi HigashiThe University of Osaka, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8880-3411

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency 10.52926/jpmjkb2307Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22H05163Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24K15047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting an individual's behavior in one task condition based on their behavior in a different condition is a key challenge in modeling individual decision-making tendencies. We propose a novel framework that addresses this challenge by leveraging neural networks and introducing a concept we term the 'individual latent representation'. This representation, extracted from behavior in a 'source' task condition via an encoder network, captures an individual's unique decision-making tendencies. A decoder network then utilizes this representation to generate the weights of a task-specific neural network (a 'task solver'), which predicts the individual's behavior in a 'target' task condition. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in two distinct decision-making tasks: a value-guided task and a perceptual task. Our framework offers a robust and generalizable approach for parameterizing individual variability, providing a promising pathway toward computational modeling at the individual level-replicating individuals in silico.

Indexed as

Decision MakingIndividualityHumansNeural Networks, Computercomputational biologydecision makinghumanindividualitylatent representationneurosciencesystems biology

Identifiers

PMID41553182
PMCPMC12815462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.