ArticleeLife2026
A high-resolution analysis of arrestin2 interactions responsible for CCR5 endocytosis.
Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) is crucial for regulating G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) via phosphorylation-dependent arrestin interactions. Despite detailed structural knowledge on the arrestin interactions with phosphorylated tails of GPCRs, the interplay between receptor phosphorylation and arrestin coupling to the CME machinery is not well understood, in particular due to the weakness and dynamics of the individual molecular interactions. Here, we have characterized the interactions of arrestin2, which is activated by the phosphorylated C-terminus of the human chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5), with the main protein constituents of CME, namely clathrin and AP2, by solution NMR spectroscopy, biochemical, and cellular assays. The NMR analysis revealed that arrestin2 interacts weakly with clathrin through a single binding site, independent of arrestin2 activation. In contrast, the arrestin2-AP2 interaction is stronger, requires arrestin2 activation by the CCR5 phospho-tail, and depends quantitatively on its degree of phosphorylation. These in vitro results are corroborated by cellular assays, which show that the chemokine-induced formation of a long-lived CCR5-arrestin2 internalization complex depends strongly on the interaction of arrestin2 with AP2, but not with clathrin. Taken together, these findings provide quantitative, atom-scale insights on the first steps of CCR5 endocytosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.