ReviewPlant biotechnology journal2026
Bibliometric-Based Analysis of Global Trends and Collaborative Networks in Plant Genetic Engineering (1994-2024).
Review in Plant biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Agricultural sustainability faces serious challenges from population growth, climate change and ecological degradation. Genetic modification (GM) technology can be regarded as a precise extension of the Green Revolution, aiming to balance yield enhancement with ecological integrity through biotechnology. To systematically examine global trend, this study conducts a bibliometric analysis using worldwide literature data from 1994 to 2024. The findings reveal a dual-core structure of international collaboration, centered on China and the United States. The United States is closely connected with Korea, Japan and the United Kingdom, forming a high-density cluster, while China engages with emerging regions in Southeast Asia and Africa through the Belt and Road Initiative. This initiative is intended to strengthen China's influence and is accompanied by the proliferation of technology in countries less endowed with resources. The technology lifecycle has been evolved through three distinct phases. Initially, the process of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in tobacco plants was carried out, marking the beginning of transgenic development. This was followed by the implementation of RNA interference (RNAi) technology to silence multiple genes. Finally, a breakthrough happened through the development of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technologies. The analyses conducted in this study demonstrate the preponderance of CRISPR in contemporary research, thus suggesting that the industry places a premium on technological refinement. Hence, the future technological trajectory is predicted to focus on germplasm digitization, multi-gene editing, intelligent breeding and synthetic biology. Transgenic technology will serve as a foundational support for achieving sustainable food security in the forthcoming second green revolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.