Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41553019›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology2026

Evaluating Cost-Effectiveness of 85 Endoscopic Surveillance Strategies of Nondysplastic Barrett's Esophagus.

Ravi Vissapragada, Norma B Bulamu, Roger Yazbeck, Tomonori Aoki, Tim Bright, David I Watson, Jonathan Karnon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ravi VissapragadaDiscipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Norma B BulamuDiscipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Roger YazbeckDiscipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1038-4998
Tomonori AokiDiscipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Tim BrightDiscipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
David I WatsonDiscipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Jonathan KarnonFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

APAGE/JGH Foundation Clinician-Scientist Training FellowshipCancer Council South Australia Beat Cancer Early Career Research FellowshipHospital Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBarrett's esophagus is the known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), a cancer with poor prognosis. While endoscopic surveillance detects early dysplasia and prevents progression, most Barrett's esophagus patients do not progress to EAC, leading to invasive and costly surveillance. This study aimed to identify cost-effective endoscopic surveillance strategies by risk stratifying patients based on Barrett's esophagus segment length and sex.

methodsA Markov cohort model was developed to simulate the natural history of Barrett's esophagus to EAC. The model assessed 85 surveillance strategies and varied endoscopy intervals from 2 to 10 years for nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus and 6-12 months for dysplasia. Risk stratification was based on segment length (≤ 2 and ≤ 3 cm) and sex. Costs, utilities and transition probabilities were derived from published literature and clinical databases. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed, and cost-effectiveness was evaluated from a third-party payer perspective using a threshold of AU$50 000/QALY (2023 US dollars 35 945/QALY).

resultsThe most cost-effective strategy was biennial surveillance for long-segment BE (> 2 cm) and 12-month surveillance for LGD, excluding surveillance in low-risk patients (ICER US$23 737/QALY). Risk-based surveillance consistently outperformed nonstratified strategies. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the model, with key drivers being transition rates and endoscopy costs.

conclusionWe identified cost-effective risk-stratified endoscopic surveillance strategies for Barrett's esophagus, particularly when excluding low-risk patients. Tailored risk-guided surveillance strategies could improve resource allocation and clinical outcomes in managing Barrett's esophagus. The conserved resources can then be utilized to identify high-risk individuals in the community.

Indexed as

Barrett EsophagusCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagoscopyPopulation SurveillanceAdenocarcinomaDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMarkov ChainsTime FactorsBarrett's esophaguscost‐utility analysisendoscopic surveillanceMarkov model

Identifiers

PMID41553019
PMCPMC12969248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.