ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Real-World Outcomes With Inetetamab-Based Regimens for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis in China.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-world outcomes and safety of inetetamab plus pyrotinib and chemotherapy in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionInetetamab has demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety in treating HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).MethodsThe multicenter retrospective study enrolled 140 patients with HER2-positive MBC who received inetetamab-based regimens between November 2020 and April 2023. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.ResultsThe median patient age was 53 (range: 27-90) years, with inetetamab-based regimens administered as first-, second-, or third-line (or later) therapy in 13 (9.3%), 29 (20.7%), and 98 (70.0%) patients, respectively. Median PFS was 6.1 months in the overall population, with an ORR of 35.0% and a DCR of 77.1%. Patients receiving inetetamab as first- or second-line therapy had significantly longer median PFS (14.5 months; 95% CI, 9.5-19.5) than those receiving it as third-line or later therapy (4.8 months; 95% CI, 4.2-5.3;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.