ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026
Drosophila melanogaster larvae generate force to counteract external mechanical pressure.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To counteract or to retreat presents a fundamental dilemma for biological organisms when facing adverse abiotic environmental conditions. In many cases, the predominant strategy animals adopt is to retreat. However, whether counteraction is possible and how the choice between counteraction and retreat is decided are not clear. Here, we report that Drosophila melanogaster larvae can actively counter external mechanical pressure, inspired by Drosophila larval cleft-squeezing behaviour. We developed a behavioural paradigm to investigate the counteracting force of larvae in response to external pressure. Instead of retreating by crawling backward, some D. melanogaster larvae could crawl forward and act against the external physical pressure. Under externally applied forces of 25 mN, 93.9% of forward peristaltic movements increased the counteracting force, while 88.2% of backward peristaltic movements decreased it. The active nature of the counteracting force was reflected by a longer inter-wave delay, more oscillation work and a longer force wave period during consecutive forward peristaltic waves. As the external force was increased from 25 mN to 50, 75 and 100 mN, counteraction by forward peristalsis became less frequent, while retreat by backward peristalsis was more frequent. A reduction of the external pressure immediately following the counteracting forward peristalsis, which might serve as rewarding signal, reinforced the counteraction and induced more forward peristalsis. The rewarding effect of reducing external pressure by forward crawling was much greater than that produced by backward crawling. Our study sheds light on the intricate mechanisms underlying animal proactive responses to adverse abiotic environmental conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.