ReviewInternational journal of cancer2026
Predicting optimal impact interventions in the post-HPV vaccination world.
Review in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting optimal impact interventions in the post-HPV vaccination world.International journal of cancer · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prophylactic vaccination is a powerful tool that changes exposure to infections and associated morbidity of preventable diseases. We discuss the impact of pneumococci and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination on the population biology of the two micro-organisms and related public health effects. Data on HPV type-replacement in communities where vaccine-covered HPVs are almost eliminated, and interactions of the remaining HPV types on the risk of cervical cancer are reviewed. Results of comprehensive models for European country-specific conduction of cervical screening among HPV-vaccinated and unvaccinated women, assuming different HPV-vaccination coverage and strategies, are discussed in our policy-oriented review. An acceptable balance of benefits and harms of cervical cancer screening in HPV vaccinated populations requires an understanding of cancer risks in differently vaccinated birth cohorts. Finally, the challenges are complex but can be met if strategies are applied that (i) as fast as possible achieve herd effect and (ii) use a risk-based design of HPV screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.