Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41552796›Full record

ArticleSAGE open nursing

A Cross-Sectional Study of Clinical Leadership Needs and Safety Climate: Differences Between Nurses and Nurse Managers.

Majd T Mrayyan, Jamal M A Ismail

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Majd T MrayyanDepartment of Community and Mental Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8401-4976
Jamal M A IsmailEmergency Room, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8011-7943

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Research shows steady growth in clinical leadership (CL); however, CL is still misunderstood in all clinical environments. Few studies have been conducted on the CL needs of nursing staff. No studies have linked CL needs (CLeeNs) in nursing to safety climate (SC) in clinical settings. Therefore, this study analyzed the differences in the perceived nurses' CL needs and SC between nurses and nurse managers. Methods: A cross-sectional research design was implemented employing an online survey. A convenience sample of 252 registered nurses (RNs) and 139 nurse managers was employed using the Clinical Leadership Needs Analysis (CLeeNA) instrument and the Safety Climate Survey (SCS). Results: The chi-square test showed that nurse managers differed from nurses in most of the sample demographics, except in their time commitment, area of work, and the reported decision-making style in their area of work. The mean score of the overall scale of CLeeNs was "very important" ( Conclusions: CL and CLeeNs are essential for a safe climate; however, little is known about how nurses and nurse managers differ in their perceived CL and SC in practice. CL should be sustained in all hospital settings. The low perceived SC is worrying and mandates immediate intervention at all organizational levels. Notably, a negative correlation was observed between CLeeNs and SC, suggesting that stronger perceptions of CL do not necessarily translate into more favorable SC perceptions.

Indexed as

clinical leadership needsnurse managersnursessafety climate

Identifiers

PMID41552796
PMCPMC12811574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.