ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2026
Anti-emicizumab antibodies and their relevance in clinical practice.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Emicizumab is licensed for treatment of people with hemophilia A (HA) of all ages, with and without factor (F)VIII inhibitors. It is well tolerated, and most of the treatment-related adverse events are of mild intensity and transient. As for other therapeutic proteins, the potential of emicizumab to induce anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) should be considered when a decrease in treatment efficacy is observed. Data from 7 phase 3/3b pivotal studies showed that 5.1% of treated patients developed ADAs, <1% being activity neutralizing. Among them, 1 case required discontinuation of emicizumab due to loss of treatment efficacy. To date, among several thousands of patients treated with emicizumab, 5 cases of ADAs requiring treatment discontinuation have been reported. Objectives: Monitoring anti-emicizumab antibodies in 67 subjects with congenital HA who switched to emicizumab prophylaxis from FVIII products or bypassing agents. Methods: The anti-emicizumab antibodies were tested, depending on patient availability, at baseline and longitudinally at 5, 10, 20, and 50 weeks after the first dose, as well as when clinically required. Results: ADAs were detected in 4 of 67 cases (5.9%) on at least 2 occasions and were not necessarily associated to significant decreased emicizumab concentration, activated partial thromboplastin time prolongation or bleeding episodes. Only 1 of 4 ADA-positive patients required emicizumab discontinuation due to treatment failure. Conclusion: The present findings confirm that the development of anti-emicizumab antibodies is a rare event, particularly those with neutralizing activity. Routine monitoring should be reserved only for patients with clinical manifestations of bleeding when therapy failure is suspected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.