ReviewCureus2026
Bullous Diseases in the Perioperative Setting: Anesthetic Considerations.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bullous skin disorders, including epidermolysis bullosa, pemphigus, and bullous pemphigoid, pose distinctive anesthetic challenges due to extreme cutaneous fragility, mucosal involvement, fluid imbalances, an increased risk of infection, and multisystem comorbidities. Although these patients frequently require surgical or procedural care, evidence guiding perioperative management is limited to isolated case reports and small series. This systematic review aimed to synthesize contemporary data on anesthetic and perioperative strategies for patients with autoimmune and inherited bullous diseases. We conducted a PROSPERO-registered review (CRD420251160409) of English-language studies published from 2015 to 2025 that reported perioperative management of patients with bullous skin disorders undergoing any form of anesthesia. A total of 26 studies met the inclusion criteria. Across these reports, we identified 17 distinct intraoperative precautions, most of which focused on minimizing shear, pressure, and adhesive trauma. The most frequently described interventions included padded or lubricated pulse oximetry, ocular lubrication, cotton interfaces under blood pressure cuffs, non-adhesive ECG monitoring, and extensive pressure-point padding. Airway-specific strategies, such as lubrication of equipment, smaller endotracheal tubes, and tape-free fixation, were consistently recommended to mitigate risks associated with mucosal erosions, bleeding, and airway narrowing. Less common measures addressed environmental warming, humidification, vascular access using ultrasound, and preoperative fluid or electrolyte optimization. The predominance of skin- and mucosa-directed precautions reflects the central role of dermatologic vulnerability in perioperative planning. However, reviewed studies also emphasized broader systemic considerations, including steroid-related metabolic changes, cardiovascular and neurologic comorbidities, renal impairment, infection risk, and the need for multidisciplinary coordination. Despite consistent themes, no standardized guidelines exist regarding preferred anesthetic techniques, agent selection, or postoperative monitoring. In conclusion, current evidence underscores the importance of atraumatic handling, meticulous airway planning, and individualized, multisystem assessment in the anesthetic care of patients with bullous diseases. Future prospective studies are needed to establish evidence-based protocols and optimize perioperative outcomes in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.