ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High Burden of Febrile Sub-microscopic Plasmodium Mixed Infections in Central India: A Cross-Sectional Study.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Malaria is still a public health challenge across many regions of the world. With significant efforts, it has become a target for elimination in near future. However, elimination requires early and accurate diagnosis and despite the fact that malaria elimination is nearing in several countries, specific and sensitive diagnosis of malaria and its causative species remains inadequate in many near-elimination settings, including India. With the advent and increasing usage of nucleic acid-based detection of Methods: The purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude of Results: The analyses revealed 15% misidentification rate (408/2706). Surprisingly, microscopy misidentified >98% of mixed-infections (400/405) as mono-infections (almost all as Discussion: These findings suggest that we are overestimating
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.