Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41552665›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2025

Visualizing stability: a sensitivity analysis framework for t-SNE embeddings.

Susanne Zabel, Philipp Hennig, Kay Nieselt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susanne ZabelInstitute for Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Philipp HennigDepartment of Computer Science, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Kay NieseltInstitute for Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

t-distributed Stochastic Neighbour Embedding (t-SNE) is a cornerstone for visualizing high-dimensional biological data, where each high-dimensional data point is represented as a point in a two-dimensional map. However, this static map provides no information about the stability of the visual layout, the features that influence it, or the impact of uncertainty in the input data. This work introduces a computational framework that allows one to extend the standard t-SNE plot by visual clues about the stability of the t-SNE embedding. First, we perform a sensitivity analysis to determine feature influence: by combining the Implicit Function Theorem with automatic differentiation, our method computes the sensitivity of the embedding w.r.t. the input data, provided in a Jacobian of first-order derivatives. Heatmap-visualizations of this Jacobian or summarizations thereof reveal which input features are most influential in shaping the embedding and identifying regions of structural instability. Second, when input data uncertainty is available, our framework uses this Jacobian to propagate error, probabilistically quantifying the positional uncertainty of each embedded point. This uncertainty is visualized by augmenting the plot with hypothetical outcomes, which display the positional confidence of each point. We apply our framework to three diverse biological datasets (bulk RNA-seq, proteomics, and single-cell transcriptomics), demonstrating its ability to directly link visual patterns to their underlying biological drivers and reveal ambiguities invisible in a standard plot. By providing this principled means to assess the robustness and interpretability of t-SNE visualizations, our work enables more rigorous and informed scientific conclusions in bioinformatics.

Indexed as

data insightserror propagationexplainable machine learningt-SNEuncertaintyvisualization

Identifiers

PMID41552665
PMCPMC12808344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.