ArticleResuscitation plus2026
The effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics administration on the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients undergoing ECPR.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Comatose Patients to Prevent Early-Onset Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prophylactic Antibiotics and 30-Day Survival in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients Undergoing VA-ECMO: A Multicenter Observational Study.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Despite improved outcomes with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a significant complication. While prophylactic antibiotics are not recommended for conventional CPR, their effectiveness in ECPR patients remains unclear. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of the SAVE-J II study, a multicenter, retrospective cohort of OHCA patients treated with ECPR. Patients who died within three days of admission were excluded. The primary outcome was early-onset VAP development, with secondary outcomes being 30-day mortality and neurological outcomes at discharge. The effect of prophylactic antibiotics, administered within 24 h after admission, was estimated by combining propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression. Missing covariates were multiply imputed. Results: Of 2157 patients, 919 were included for propensity score matching, yielding a matched cohort of 448. In the matched cohort, prophylactic antibiotics administration was not significantly associated with VAP incidence (aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39-1.01), although the incidence was numerically lower (24.1% vs 31.3%). No effects were observed in 30-day mortality (aOR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.64-1.57) or unfavorable neurological outcomes (aOR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.56-1.52). Sensitivity analyses using different definitions of VAP and population yielded consistent results. Conclusions: Although point estimates suggested a possible reduction in VAP, the results did not reach statistical significance, and no improvements in survival or neurological outcomes were detected. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted before advocating routine prophylactic antibiotic use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.