Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41552630›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2026

Assessing adult attachment after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an exploratory analysis and construct validation of the ECR-RS.

Nanna Hansen, Cæcilia von Tangen Gehrt Sivertsen, Dea Siggaard Stenbæk, Mitti Blakoe, Camilla Dichman, Bo Gregers Winkel, Anders Wieghorst, Britt Borregaard, Mette Kirstine Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nanna HansenDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Cæcilia von Tangen Gehrt SivertsenDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Dea Siggaard StenbækNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mitti BlakoeDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Camilla DichmanDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bo Gregers WinkelDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anders WieghorstDepartment of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Britt BorregaardDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Mette Kirstine WagnerDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To explore the construct validity of the 'Experience in Close Relationships - Relationship Structures'-questionnaire (ECR-RS) in a population of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors. Objectives were to (i) describe item- and scale-level response patterns, and (ii) evaluate the preliminary construct validity of the ECR-RS, including its dimensional (structural), known-groups, and convergent validity. Methods: An exploratory cross-sectional validation study, with OHCA survivors completing the ECR-RS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the mental health component from the Short Form-12 (SF-12 MCS) three months post- arrest. Descriptive statistics and floor/ceiling analyses were performed. Dimensional validity was assessed using response distribution patterns and exploratory factor analysis (EFA), followed by reliability using Cronbach's Results: Among 123 survivors (median age 59.9 years, 84 % male), ECR-RS total scores were low on both subscales and floor effects were observed at scale level (31 % for avoidant and 72 % for anxious attachment). EFA supported the expected two-factor structure, though item 4-6 showed poor loadings/cross-loadings. Internal consistency was acceptable (total scale Cronbach's Conclusion: The ECR-RS demonstrated partial construct validity among OHCA survivors, but item-level inconsistencies and pronounced floor effects limit its utility. Findings highlight the need for a revised instrument better suited to post-cardiac arrest relational and psychological dynamics.

Indexed as

Cross-sectional studyInterpersonal relationsPatient-reported outcomePsychometricResuscitation

Identifiers

PMID41552630
PMCPMC12811464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.