ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
A National Evaluation of Upper Extremity Weightlifting Injury Surveillance: The High Risk in Youth and Adults With an Underutilization in Older Adults.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Common weightlifting injuries of the upper extremity.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Weightlifting improves physical fitness; however, injuries can lead to impaired functionality and long-term complications. Data on weightlifting-related injuries are limited. Purpose: To evaluate the epidemiologic trends of weightlifting-associated upper extremity injuries, further stratified by age. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiologic study. Methods: This analysis used the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database, including all patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a primary upper extremity weightlifting injury between 2021 and 2024. Outcomes included patient demographic characteristics, final diagnosis, primary body region injured, and mechanism of injury (MOI). Patients were stratified into 4 age groups: pediatric (<18 years), young adult (18-39 years), middle-age (40-64 years), and geriatric (≥65 years). Chi-square tests and post hoc comparisons were used to evaluate categorical variables. Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between age groups. Statistical significance was predetermined at <.05. Results: After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 3189 upper extremity weightlifting injuries (national estimate [NE] = 127,667) were analyzed. Across all ages, sprain/strain (NE = 36,054; 26.2%), fracture/crush/avulsion (NE = 22,388; 15.8%), and laceration/puncture (NE = 9020; 7.2%) were the most common diagnoses. Injuries most frequently involved the shoulder (NE = 45,825; 33.8%), finger (NE = 32,398; 28.1%), and upper arm (NE = 7827; 8.8%). The most common MOIs were drop/crush injuries (NE = 34,757; 30.1%), pulling movements (NE = 14,232; 10.5%), and overhead movements (NE = 11,110; 8.3%). Pediatric patients were 2.5 times more likely to sustain finger injuries (odds ratio [OR], 2.536; 95% CI, 2.191-2.935; Conclusion: Sprain/strain and fracture/crush/avulsion were frequent upper extremity weightlifting injuries, often secondary to drop/crush injuries and overhead movements. Pediatric athletes were more likely to sustain finger and drop/crush injuries, whereas shoulder injuries affected all adult age groups. The low proportion of geriatric weightlifters suggests there may be underuse of a sport effective in combating osteoporosis. These insights into overall and age-specific injury patterns can help shape evidence-based recommendations to reduce the overall injury burden and promote safe resistance training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.