ArticleACS omega2026
Pharmacophoric Investigation of a Natural Product-like Class of Aromatase Inhibitors Using Molecular Modeling.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometriosis is a condition affecting approximately 10% of reproductive-age women in which endometrial tissue is found in locations outside the uterus, often causing debilitating symptoms. Aromatase, an enzyme that also plays a key role in hormone-dependent breast cancer, is abnormally expressed in the diseased tissue and converts androgens to self-produce estrogen in the diseased tissue. Available aromatase inhibitors suffer from side effects that could be mitigated with an inhibitor based on natural products. In this work, several analogues of an isoflavanone-like scaffold, a new and underexplored scaffold for aromatase inhibition, are analyzed to map the pharmacophore and identify leads. Ligands are first docked to the active site, with docking scores in the range of -11.1 to -7.9 kcal/mol, and the top 50% are analyzed further with molecular dynamics and free energy analyses. General trends of the ligands are explored, followed by a deeper analysis of the five best-performing ligands. These ligands have root-mean-square fluctuation (RMSF) values between 0.87 and 1.77 Å and binding affinities between -35.41 and -37.24 kcal/mol, which is comparable to the control drug Letrozole (-35.80 kcal/mol). These five ligands have stable binding modes and strong binding affinities and are synthetically available. The most successful ligands have a para geometry on positions 2 and 5 of the B ring, and interactions are generally improved with nonpolar functional groups. These ligands, particularly compounds 4 and 5, provide ideal starting points for further experimental analysis of this novel scaffold, and the pharmocophore map will inform the rational design.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.