ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026
Collaboration under pressure: sustaining One Health research teams in a post-COVID environment.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sustainability of contemporary One Health research increasingly relies on the capacity of universities, research institutes and partner organisations to support collaborative teams. Such teams are indispensable because they integrate diverse expertise, address complex problems and respond rapidly to health crises such as COVID-19. One Health provides a compelling exemplar of collaborative research, uniting human, animal and environmental health to tackle global challenges and emerging infectious diseases. Yet the resilience of such teams is being tested by neoliberal reforms that have reshaped higher education into a competitive marketplace and by managerial practices that prioritise measurable outputs over collegiality, autonomy and disciplinary breadth. The pandemic exposed the fragility of this model: laboratories closed, workloads intensified and financial pressures triggered redundancies, even as collaboration proved essential to global health responses. This Opinion article examines how systemic pressures and interpersonal dynamics intersect to influence the functioning of research teams in a post-COVID environment. It highlights funding precarity, employment insecurity, inequities and political instability as persistent challenges, and explores how performance pressures and competition can affect collaboration. Sustaining research teams requires institutional reforms, inclusive leadership, recognition of diverse contributions and alignment with global frameworks such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), so that One Health research and other multidisciplinary endeavours addressing emerging and neglected diseases remain resilient, impactful and socially relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.