Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41552383›Full record

ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2026

Precision, accuracy, and reliability of a threshold hunting method for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Yuichiro Shirota, Juuri Otsuka, Masashi Hamada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuichiro ShirotaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, the University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Juuri OtsukaDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Masashi HamadaDepartment of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate precision, accuracy, and reliability of a threshold hunting method to estimate resting motor threshold (RMT) using parameter estimation by sequential testing and maximum likelihood estimation (PEST-MLE). Methods: In 53 healthy participants, single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered to estimate RMT with cutoff values of 0.05 mV and 0.2 mV. RMT was inferred from 30-trial PEST-MLE algorithm for at maximum two days with two estimation sessions per day, comprising Sessions 1 to 4. Precision and accuracy were assessed within each session. Repeatability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), reproducibility coefficient (RC), and standard error of measurement (SEM). Results: For both 0.05 mV and 0.2 mV, 18 trials were needed to have good accuracy. ICC greater than 0.8 was achieved for within-day comparison but the ICC of between-day comparison was lower. RC and SEM were around 10 % and 5 %, respectively. Conclusions: At 18th trial the estimations were converged in terms of precision and accuracy, and good reliability was achieved at that stage. Significance: RMT estimation with the PEST-MLE is a rapid and reliable approach that can be implemented for future clinical and scientific studies.

Indexed as

AccuracyAdaptive methodAutomationMaximum likelihood estimationPrecisionResting motor thresholdTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41552383
PMCPMC12803948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.