Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41552376›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2026

Interfacility Collaboration for Hemophilia Care in Japan: A Retrospective Database Study Using a Japanese Healthcare Claims Database.

Ei Kinai, Masako Yamaguchi, Akira Shirahata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ei KinaiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Tokyo Medical University Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5415-0854
Masako YamaguchiJapan Medical Office, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4011-3918
Akira ShirahataUniversity of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan Kitakyushu Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: In Japan, about 6000 patients with hemophilia A (PwHA) are separately cared for at ~1000 clinics or hospitals. Interfacility collaboration (IFC) between hemophilia treatment centers and "satellite" medical facilities located closer to patients is necessary to eliminate care disparities. To facilitate IFC, the Japan Hemophilia Network Committee (JHNC) was approved in 2018 by the Japanese Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis. However, it is unclear whether the JHNC is functioning effectively to provide comprehensive and specialized care to PwHA seen by doctors at non-expert facilities. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective, longitudinal, observational study using the JMDC Claims Database to assess IFC for hemophilia A in Japan. Results are presented in adherence with the "Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)" guidelines. Methods: PwHA were classified into those who were usually treated at non-expert ( Results: Among patients who usually attended non-expert facilities, the proportion who received hemophilia-specific tests at expert facilities was persistently low during the observation period (6.9%-16.3% for joint examinations and 15.4%-32.6% for blood coagulation tests). The rate of visits to expert facilities among the non-expert facilities group did not increase during the study period. The proportion of invasive procedures with bleeding risks performed at expert facilities was low (< 20%), and some procedures requiring specialist consultation were performed at non-expert facilities. Conclusion: These results suggest that IFC for the care of PwHA between non-expert and expert hemophilia care medical facilities could be strengthened in Japan.

Indexed as

blood coagulation testscomprehensive health carehemophilia Ahemophilic arthropathyjoint examinationsmedical network

Identifiers

PMID41552376
PMCPMC12809262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.