ArticleIEEE robotics and automation letters2026
Multi-modal sensing in colonoscopy: a data-driven approach.
Article in IEEE robotics and automation letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soft optical sensors hold potential for enhancing minimally invasive procedures like colonoscopy, yet their complex, multi-modal responses pose significant challenges. This work introduces a machine learning (ML) framework for real-time estimation of 3D shape and contact force in a soft robotic sleeve for colonoscopy. To overcome limitations of manual calibration and collect large datasets for ML, we developed an automated platform for collecting data across a range of orientations, curvatures, and contact forces. A cascaded ML architecture was implemented for sequential estimation of contact force and 3D shape, enabling an accuracy with errors of 4.7% for curvature, 2.37% for orientation, and 5.5% for force tracking. We also explored the potential of ML for contact localization by training a model to estimate contact intensity and location across 16 indenters distributed along the sleeve. The force intensity was estimated with an error ranging from 0.06 N to 0.31 N throughout the indenters. Despite the proximity of the contact points, the system achieved high localization performances, with 8 indenters reaching over 80% accuracy, demonstrating promising spatial resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.