ReviewJournal of translational autoimmunity2026
Autoantibody and biomarker detection in the follow-up of autoimmune diseases: state of the art and future perspectives.
Review in Journal of translational autoimmunity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Originally developed for the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases, the application of autoantibodies and related biomarkers has been extended in certain cases to monitor therapeutic efficacy and to predict disease recurrence and/or severity. Several critical considerations must be addressed prior to employing autoantibodies for monitoring purposes: (i) whether the autoantibody is pathogenic, as exemplified by anti-glomerular basement membrane and anti-acetylcholine receptor autoantibodies; (ii) whether the autoantibody level is essential for tracking disease activity, which may necessitate establishing prognostic thresholds and/or adapting detection methodologies; (iii) whether there is added value in combining autoantibodies, as demonstrated with anti-dsDNA and anti-chromatin antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus; (iv) which immunoglobulin isotype is optimal for monitoring; and (v) whether alternative biomarkers exist that provide greater accuracy for patient follow-up. Additional issues remain unresolved, including appropriate intervals between measurements, intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility, inter-assay variations, and ethnic variability, among others. To address these challenges, the European Autoimmunity Standardization Initiative (EASI) has proposed adapted strategies for utilizing autoantibodies in the longitudinal assessment of selected autoimmune diseases, as presented in this special issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.