ArticleCureus2025
Braking Distance and Reaction Time Unchanged Across Hand-Use Conditions in Healthy Volunteers.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to utilize driving simulator technology to evaluate braking time and distance, controlling for variables such as hand dominance and single versus both hand use. Methods This prospective observational study included healthy volunteers aged 18 and older with no recent upper extremity surgery. Data collected included age, hand dominance, and driving experience. Braking distance and reaction time were measured using Carnetsoft driving simulator software (Groningen, the Netherlands). The participants were instructed to use both hands, their dominant hand, or their non-dominant hand for each trial, accelerating to 60 miles per hour (mph) and decelerating to a stop, with 15 trials per participant, five per hand position. Linear mixed models were used to assess the association between hand use and braking time, accounting for multiple trials. Results Thirty-three healthy volunteers participated in this study. No statistically significant differences were observed in acceleration reaction time, brake reaction time, stop reaction time, or braking distance across the hand-use conditions, both hands, dominant hand, and non-dominant hand. Conclusion This study suggests that hand positioning does not significantly impact braking performance in healthy individuals under the conditions tested. This study highlights the potential use of driving simulators for evaluating specific driving abilities, which could inform rehabilitation and clinical assessments for individuals recovering from upper extremity surgeries, particularly as driver-assistive technologies evolve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.