Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41552228›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Impact of Prolonged Catheterization for Vesicourethral Leakage on Continence and Quality of Life After Robotic Prostatectomy.

Hisanori Taniguchi, Junichi Ikeda, Monta Inoue, Yuki Masuo, Hidefumi Kinoshita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hisanori TaniguchiUrology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, JPN.
Junichi IkedaUrology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, JPN.
Monta InoueUrology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, JPN.
Yuki MasuoUrology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, JPN.
Hidefumi KinoshitaUrology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo determine whether prolonged urinary catheterization due to vesicourethral anastomotic leakage (VAL) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) impacts urinary continence recovery and quality of life (QOL).

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 360 patients who underwent transperitoneal RARP at a single institution from January 2022 to December 2024. All patients underwent cystography on postoperative day 6 or 7. Those with VAL requiring extended catheterization were compared with patients undergoing standard removal. Continence was assessed using Question 5 of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), and QOL was measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), FACT-Prostate (FACT-P), and the EPIC urinary subscale. Outcomes were evaluated up to 24 months postoperatively.

resultsVAL was detected in 36 patients (10.0%). Continence recovery did not differ significantly between the prolonged and standard catheter groups at 1, 6, or 12 months (63%, 89%, 92% vs. 54%, 85%, 93%, respectively). QOL outcomes were also comparable, although preoperative EPIC scores were lower in the prolonged catheter group. Multivariate analysis identified greater prostate specimen weight (p = 0.049) and intraoperative leakage (p = 0.002) as independent predictors of prolonged catheterization.

conclusionsProlonged urinary catheterization due to VAL after RARP does not adversely affect long-term urinary continence recovery or urinary-related QOL.

Indexed as

robot-assisted radical prostatectomysurgical roboticsurinary anastomotic leak (ual)urinary cathetersurinary incontinence (ui)

Identifiers

PMID41552228
PMCPMC12804428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.