ArticleCureus2025
Learning From the Uncommon in Common Practice: A Case Report on Metamizole-Induced Agranulocytosis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Agranulocytosis is a severe haematological disorder with multiple aetiologies, among which drug-induced causes are clinically significant. Metamizole is a non-opioid analgesic and antipyretic agent, used for the management of severe pain and high fever unresponsive to other measures. However, its use remains controversial due to the risk of metamizole-induced agranulocytosis (MIA), a rare but potentially life-threatening adverse reaction. This case aims to raise clinical awareness of MIA, highlighting the importance of its cautious use in daily practice. To our knowledge, it provides valuable clinical insight given the rapid onset of severe agranulocytosis, absence of alternative causative factors, and successful recovery with early intervention. We present the case of a 70-year-old female patient who underwent elective abdominoplasty. Post-operative period was complicated with abdominal pain and sustained fever due to an abscess on the abdominal wall. Initial management with paracetamol and empiric antibiotics was ineffective. After surgical drainage, fever persisted and treatment with metamizole was started. Five days after starting metamizole, laboratory tests revealed agranulocytosis (90/µL). Metamizole was discontinued, and patient was placed under protective isolation. She received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and broad-spectrum antibiotics. Diagnostic workup excluded other sources of infection and neoplastic causes of agranulocytosis. Clinical and laboratory findings suggested MIA. Patient completed three days of G-CSF and 30 days of antibiotics, achieving full clinical and haematological recovery, with no recurrence during follow-up. Metamizole-induced agranulocytosis is a rare but serious adverse reaction requiring early recognition. This case illustrates the importance of maintaining clinical vigilance and performing early haematological monitoring, particularly in high-risk patients. Clinicians should exercise caution when prescribing metamizole, limiting its use to well-justified indications and short durations. Continuous pharmacovigilance and further epidemiological studies are essential to define the true incidence, risk factors, and optimal management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.