ReviewCureus2025
Clinical Utility of Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Study the Predictors of Favorable Surgical Outcomes.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study analyzes current data based on clinical, radiological, and procedural parameters in order to determine predictors of effective transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) results. The systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42024497170) implemented PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines for its methodology. The search of multiple databases during the last 20 years resulted in 30 studies that met the criteria for evaluating TFESI outcome predictors. The research team conducted data extraction and quality assessment, followed by random-effects proportion-based meta-analysis to present findings through tables and forest plots, and risk-of-bias analysis. The meta-analysis evaluated 56 prognostic factors for TFESI outcomes. Findings showed that better outcomes occurred in younger patients who had a shorter symptom duration, lower body mass index, and no previous spine surgery history. Likewise, certain disc herniation locations, low-grade nerve root compression, and contrast distribution patterns were shown to be imaging markers for improved results. Poor treatment outcomes were associated with anatomical variations, facet tropism, and severe central stenosis. Overall evidence was heterogeneous, although electrodiagnostic results and procedural accuracy also had an impact. The study identified a number of factors that influence lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection procedure success rates. Shorter duration of symptoms, no prior surgery, and certain MRI findings were more dependable; however, demographic considerations indicated inconsistent results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.