ArticleCureus2025
Exploring Triphala as a Biocompatible Alternative to Chemical Denture Cleansers: Effects on Flexural Strength and Surface Roughness of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) and Flexible Polymers.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe longevity and functional performance of denture base materials can be significantly influenced by routine hygiene maintenance. Natural alternatives such as Triphala may offer accessible and cost-effective cleansing solutions, especially in settings where commercial denture cleansers are less available. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of Triphala and a commercial cleanser (Clinsodent) on the flexural strength and surface roughness of flexible and conventional polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base materials after prolonged use. STUDY
designAn in vitro comparative experimental study conducted under standardized laboratory conditions. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 120 denture base specimens (n=30 per group) were fabricated using two materials: flexible nylon-based polymer and heat-cured PMMA. The specimens were divided into four groups based on material type and cleansing agent used. All specimens were subjected to overnight immersion in their respective solutions for 120 consecutive days. Flexural strength was measured using the three-point bending method, while surface roughness was evaluated using a contact profilometer. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (p<0.05).
resultsPMMA specimens exhibited significantly higher flexural strength compared to flexible materials (p<0.05). Triphala-treated samples showed reduced surface roughness in both materials compared to those treated with Clinsodent. Group 2 (PMMA + Triphala) demonstrated the highest flexural strength (91.79±0.04 MPa), while Group 3 (flexible + Clinsodent) recorded the lowest (28.52±0.16 MPa). Surface roughness was lowest in Group 2 (0.23±0.02 μm) and highest in Group 3 (1.71±0.03 μm).
conclusionTriphala may be a promising natural alternative to chemical denture cleansers, with favorable effects on surface roughness and acceptable mechanical performance. However, long-term clinical studies are warranted to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.