ArticleCureus2025
Effectiveness of a Brief Educational Video on the Correct Placement of Automated Chest Compression Devices: A Prospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective The time to the onset of high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is directly correlated with the chance of survival for cardiac arrest. The use of automated chest compression devices, such as the LUCAS, has become a common means of performing CPR. We sought to determine whether an educational intervention improves the correct placement of an automated chest compression device, and to identify whether placement accuracy varies by performer profession or years of experience. Methods Emergency department technicians, nurses, residents, and attending physicians were recruited to perform placement of a LUCAS device before and after watching an educational video created by the LUCAS manufacturer. The correct placement of an automated chest compression device was determined by three different emergency medicine attending physicians, using manufacturer instructions. The distance between the volunteer's placement of the LUCAS and the ideal placement location, before and after watching the educational video, was recorded. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the pre- and post-education measurements. Results A total of 50 employees participated in the study. The median distance from correct placement was 3.2 cm prior to the educational intervention and 3.3 cm after the educational intervention, indicating no significant change. There was no difference in the accuracy of device placement when comparing physicians and non-physicians. There was no relationship between years of experience and the accuracy of device placement. All participants found participating in the educational intervention useful. Conclusion In this small, single-system, prospective study, we found that a single, brief, passive educational intervention does not improve the correct placement of an automated chest compression device. Additional data are needed to understand how this video might be utilized in an ongoing quality improvement project or as part of a larger, integrated educational intervention study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.