Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41552122›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Efficiency and Precision in Orthodontics: A Case Report and Literature Review on the Simplified Lingual Bonding System.

Subrat Satapathy, Nikita Agarwal, Suryakanta Das

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Subrat SatapathyOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Srirama Chandra Bhanja Dental College and Hospital, Cuttack, IND.
Nikita AgarwalOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Srirama Chandra Bhanja Dental College and Hospital, Cuttack, IND.
Suryakanta DasOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Srirama Chandra Bhanja Dental College and Hospital, Cuttack, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The laboratory stage of lingual orthodontics imposes specific difficulties unique to the specialty, including anatomical variance, bracket placement discrepancies, and an accurate amount of overcorrection. Traditional bonding methods often require added compensatory resin pads, which can affect the patient's hygiene and bracket retention. The simplified lingual bonding system was developed to address these issues by replacing traditional bonding pads with bracket bases designed according to their anatomy, providing optimal placement within the lingual fossa. This bonding method uses a simplified bonding technique and eliminates the added step of creating a setup model while maintaining a level of accuracy in the placement. The method will include a step-by-step process for proper surface preparation, bracket height in position, and obtaining a custom transfer tray. The enhanced process minimizes the challenges of indirect bonding, along with improved clinical success, and provides the patient with smaller brackets, leading to a smaller appliance that should increase comfort. By integrating standardized protocols with innovative laboratory techniques, the simplified lingual bonding system represents a significant advancement in lingual orthodontics.

Indexed as

anatomical bracketsindirect bondinglingual orthodonticssimplified lingual bonding systemtransfer trays

Identifiers

PMID41552122
PMCPMC12811833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.