ReviewCureus2025
Factors Affecting Patient Satisfaction in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient satisfaction and its predictors in emergency department services at debre tabor comprehensive specialized hospital in Ethiopia: an ordinal logistic regression analysis.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient satisfaction is widely recognized as a key indicator of healthcare quality and an essential measure of performance in emergency departments. As the emergency department represents the first point of contact for many patients, understanding the factors that influence satisfaction is crucial for improving care delivery. This systematic review aimed to assess patient satisfaction and identify the factors associated with satisfaction in the emergency department. A systematic search of PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted to identify relevant studies published between 2019 and 2022 using combinations of the keywords "Factors," "Affecting," "Patient," "Satisfaction," "Emergency," and "Department." Only original, full-text research articles addressing patient satisfaction in the emergency department were included. Of the 100 records initially identified, seven studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. The included studies consisted of three cross-sectional studies, two retrospective studies, one case study, and one randomized controlled trial, conducted across Saudi Arabia, Portugal, Italy, Rotterdam, and Iran, with a total sample exceeding 3,491 emergency department patients. Overall patient satisfaction across the included studies ranged from relatively satisfied to completely satisfied. Key predictors of patient satisfaction included overall doctor satisfaction, perceived waiting time for triage, and meeting patient expectations. Additional influential factors included tangibles, assurance, reliability, responsiveness, and empathy. Shorter emergency department length of stay and the provision of general, medical, and practical information were associated with higher satisfaction, with oral communication and written leaflets being the preferred methods of information delivery. Studies conducted in Saudi Arabia reported moderate levels of satisfaction with physician and nursing care, high preference for waiting time estimation, and relatively lower satisfaction with translation services, drug information, and pain management. These findings indicate that patient satisfaction in emergency departments is influenced by a combination of communication quality, service organization, and patient-provider interaction. Targeted interventions focusing on improving communication, managing waiting time expectations, and enhancing information delivery may contribute to improved patient satisfaction in emergency care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.