ArticleCureus2025
Precision in Prosthodontic Preparation: An In Vitro Study on the Digital Evaluation of Total Occlusal Convergence Angles Using Varying Magnification Loupes.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Precise control of the total occlusal convergence (TOC) angle during tooth preparation is essential for the long-term success of fixed dental restorations. While magnifying loupes combined with proper illumination enhance visual acuity, their influence on the precision of the TOC angle during preparation remains insufficiently studied. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the impact of magnification loupes on TOC angle accuracy. Specifically, it compared mean TOC values in two planes for tooth preparations performed without magnification, with 3.2× Galilean loupes, and with 6× Keplerian loupes. Materials and methods Ninety right mandibular first molar typodont teeth were randomly assigned to three groups (n=30 each): control (no magnification), 3.2× Galilean, and 6× Keplerian. A single trained operator, who was a postgraduate student with formal training in tooth preparation techniques but no prior experience of using magnification loupes, performed standardized full-coverage crown preparations. Each specimen was mounted on a custom die base to ensure consistent positioning. Digital images were captured in buccolingual and mesiodistal planes, and TOC angles were measured using computer screen protractor software, referencing the gingival 2 mm of the axial wall following a study by Yoon et al. A blinded evaluator recorded all measurements. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc test (α=0.05). Results Both magnification groups demonstrated significantly lower TOC angles compared to the control group in both planes (P=0.001). The 6× Keplerian group achieved significantly lower TOC angles than the 3.2× Galilean group in the mesiodistal plane, though no significant difference was observed in the buccolingual plane. Conclusion The use of magnification loupes enhances the precision of TOC angle assessment during tooth preparation. Higher levels of magnification, especially with 6× Keplerian loupes, provide superior control in the mesiodistal dimension, thereby contributing to improved clinical outcomes in prosthodontic procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.