ArticleCureus2025
Analysis of the Elnady Technique on Cadaveric Tissues: A Low Barrier-to-Entry to Increase Tissue Handling Comfort, Longevity, and Safety.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Elnady technique, glycerin impregnation, stands to ameliorate a cost problem by allowing the preservation of prosection specimens in-house. When using this technique, some shrinkage is observed after dehydrating the tissues with acetone. To quantify this and to demonstrate the technique, three human brains (one whole brain, one hemisection, and one hippocampus dissection) and one heart were dehydrated using >99.5% acetone baths at room temperature; baths were changed weekly with hydrometer readings to measure purity. Organs were then immersed in glycerin baths for two weeks, removed, drained, and placed in cornstarch for curing. Dimensional measurements of organs were taken before and after treatment. There was shrinkage of the heart and brain circumference by approximately 10%, with similar shrinkages in other dimensions. Acetone removed much of the fat left after dissection of the heart and caused significant hardening of the aorta, which softened after exposure to glycerin and subsequent curing with cornstarch. Twenty-four months later, a set of three whole brains were impregnated with glycerin using the same methods. The mass, volume, and circumference were measured before and after treatment. The whole brains were dissected to expose the hippocampus. No acetone was found in the lateral ventricles of the whole brains. The whole brain impregnated with glycerin 24 months prior no longer smelled of acetone, while the recently treated brains did. At least six days after treatment, the mass of the recently treated whole brains had decreased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.