Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41552030›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2025

Impact of Teaching Strategies on Caries Detection and Management.

Swetha Sriram, Swetha Perumal, Latha Nirmal, Priya Jayakumar, Gayathri Thiruvengadam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Swetha SriramDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Swetha PerumalDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Latha NirmalDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Priya JayakumarDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Gayathri ThiruvengadamDepartment of Community Medicine, Sri Ramachandra Medical College, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims and background: The increasing prevalence of dental caries highlights the need for effective diagnostic tools. Advances in e-learning and hybrid methods offer promising solutions to improve dental education and assessment. The study aimed to assess which learning method (e-learning, tutorial, and a combination of both) garnered a better response among clinical dental students for the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) and International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS). Materials and methods: A sample of 90 dental students in the third, fourth, and final years of their dental education was selected to take part in the study, which was conducted in three phases. The learners were requested to answer a set of 15 questions given in a booklet, following which they were grouped into three groups (I, II, and III) by randomization: Group I (e-learning), group II (tutorial), and group III (e-learning + tutorial). Three weeks later, the groups were re-evaluated using the same set of questions. The data were analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare pre- and posttest scores across the three learning groups. Results: On comparing the three groups, there appears to be a substantial difference among all three groups, with group III showing a better significance than groups I and II. Conclusion: Though the use of all three learning strategies showed an improved performance by the dental students, it was the use of a combination of e-learning and tutorial that produced a better outcome compared to the other two. Clinical significance: Blended learning enhances dental students' proficiency in ICDAS and ICCMS, emphasizing its efficacy in clinical education. How to cite this article: Sriram S, Perumal S, Nirmal L,

Indexed as

Computer-assisted instructionDental cariesDental educationEducational measurementStudentsUndergraduate education

Identifiers

PMID41552030
PMCPMC12810170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.