Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41551998›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026

Botulinum toxin for endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain: a randomised, double-masked, parallel, phase 2 trial.

Barbara Illowsky Karp, Hannah K Tandon, Ninet Sinaii, Jacqueline V Aredo, Vy T Phan, Noemi Salmeri, Jay P Shah, Melissa A Merideth, Pamela Stratton

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01553201 (The Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin on Persistent Pelvic Pain in Women With Endometriosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01553201 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

The Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin on Persistent Pelvic Pain in Women With Endometriosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)Ran2014 to 2019Enrolled30ConditionsEndometriosis, Chronic Pelvic Pain, Pelvic Muscle Spasm, Quality of LifeArmsBotulinum toxin (BoNT), Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Barbara Illowsky KarpNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Hannah K TandonDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ninet SinaiiBiostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology Service, Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jacqueline V AredoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Vy T PhanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Noemi SalmeriDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jay P ShahDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Melissa A MeridethNational Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Pamela StrattonNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic pelvic pain affects one in four women. Botulinum toxin, approved for chronic migraine and cervical dystonia pain, is an emerging treatment for other pain conditions. We evaluated intramuscular pelvic floor botulinum toxin injection in women with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain and pelvic floor muscle spasm, hypothesising that botulinum toxin might reduce both spasm and pain. Methods: In this a randomised, double-masked, parallel, phase 2 trial, women with pelvic floor spasm and pain despite standard endometriosis-specific and pain treatment were randomily assigned 1:1 to injection of 100 Units onabotulinumtoxinA (15 participants) or saline placebo (14 participants) into pelvic floor muscles. The primary outcome was patient report of benefit or no benefit assessed 1 month after masked injection. Patients could choose an open injection from 1 to 12 months after masked injection. Secondary outcomes (pain rating, pain medication usage, effect duration, and other participant-reported measures) were compared to baseline ratings. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01553201. Findings: 29 participants were recruited between July 24, 2014 and May 8, 2018. All enrolled women completed the study. At 1 month, significantly more women in the toxin group reported benefit (11 (73%) of 15 vs 4 (29%) of 14; p = 0.027). Women receiving toxin attained a greater percent benefit (p = 0.034) and longer duration (p = 0.023) of pain relief. Those with at least moderate baseline pain had lower pain scores after toxin (p = 0.028). Benefit was present at 1 year in 16 of those requesting open injection (7 of 14 receiving placebo; 9 of 13 receiving toxin). 20 (77%) of 26 patients used less pain medication at 1-year (p < 0.0001), with 12 (92%) of 13 in the BoNT group and eight (62%) of 13 in the placebo group using less medication (p = 0.061). Adverse events were non-serious with no grade 3 or 4 adverse events or deaths, and were similar in both cohorts following masked and open injections. Interpretation: This study demonstrates the efficacy and safety of pelvic floor botulinum toxin injection for women with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain and pelvic floor spasm. Funding: The study was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH). Allergan, Inc. provided study drug and independent monitoring funds under a Clinical Trial Agreement with NIH and had no other role in the study.

Indexed as

Botulinum toxinChemodenervationChronic pelvic painEndometriosisPainPelvic pain

Identifiers

PMID41551998
PMCPMC12809740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.