ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Why do knowledge workers choose knowledge hiding: the mediating role of perceived stress.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The effects of generative AI usage on employee knowledge behavior: a perspective based on the Automation-Augmentation Paradox.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In today's knowledge-driven economy, knowledge workers are central to sustaining innovation, yet the phenomenon of Knowledge hiding-the deliberate withholding of requested knowledge-poses a serious challenge to collaboration and organizational performance. Drawing on conservation of resources theory, social exchange theory, and stress interaction theory, this study explores how Workplace Ostracism and task complexity influence knowledge hiding, emphasizing the mediating role of Perceived stress and the moderating role of Perceived pay fairness. Methods: Data were collected from 330 knowledge workers in Beijing through a two-wave survey combining online and offline questionnaires. Workplace Ostracism, task complexity, perceived stress, knowledge hiding, and perceived pay fairness were measured using validated scales. Hierarchical regression, confirmatory factor analysis, and bootstrapping techniques were applied to test direct, mediating, and moderating effects. Results: The results indicate that both Workplace Ostracism and Task complexity significantly and positively predict Knowledge hiding, with Perceived stress partially mediating these effects. Furthermore, Perceived pay fairness negatively moderates the relationship between Perceived stress and Knowledge hiding, as well as the indirect effects of Workplace Ostracism and Task complexity via Perceived stress. Specifically, high levels of Perceived pay fairness weaken these positive associations, whereas low levels exacerbate them. Discussion: This study makes three key contributions. First, it enriches the literature on Knowledge hiding by introducing a stress-perception perspective and highlighting Perceived stress as a central explanatory mechanism. Second, it extends conservation of resources theory and social exchange theory by identifying Perceived pay fairness as a critical boundary condition. Third, it offers actionable guidance for organizations, suggesting that enhancing compensation fairness, fostering inclusion, and managing task demands can mitigate stress-induced Knowledge hiding and promote effective knowledge sharing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.