Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41551921›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2026

E-cigarettes versus combination nicotine replacement therapy following a recent failed quit attempt: a pragmatic randomized trial through state tobacco quitlines.

Theodore L Wagener, Alice Hinton, Theodore M Brasky, Yoo Jin Cho, Laura A Beebe, Michael S Businelle, Matthew J Carpenter, Jonathan Hart, Katrina A Vickerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Theodore L WagenerThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center and OSU Center for Tobacco Research, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Alice HintonThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center and OSU Center for Tobacco Research, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Theodore M BraskyThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center and OSU Center for Tobacco Research, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Yoo Jin ChoThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center and OSU Center for Tobacco Research, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Laura A BeebeUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center and TSET Health Promotion Research Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States of America.
Michael S BusinelleUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center and TSET Health Promotion Research Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States of America.
Matthew J CarpenterHollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.
Jonathan HartUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center and TSET Health Promotion Research Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States of America.
Katrina A VickermanCenter for Wellbeing Research, RVO Health (formerly Optum), Charlotte, NC, United States of America.

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel G. Stover · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
Tissue Pathology Shared ResourceP30CA225520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI ROBERT S. MANNEL · 2018 to 2026
$27.1M
Switching to the SREC: evaluating risk reduction among quitline treatment failuresU01DA045537 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI WAGENER, THEODORE LEE · 2018 to 2020
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS P30 CA225520NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA045537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: E-cigarettes have emerged as a potentially more effective and satisfying alternative to nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) for smokers who struggle to quit. Although quitlines are effective platforms for tobacco cessation, they have not incorporated e-cigarettes due to regulatory concerns and limited clinical evidence. We evaluated whether quitline-delivered counseling combined with e-cigarettes was more effective than counseling with NRT among adults who recently failed to quit using standard quitline services. Methods: We conducted a pragmatic, open-label, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with two U.S. state quitlines between October 2020 and January 2023. Adults [N = 350; 212 (61%) female & 248 (72%) white] who were still smoking after a recent quitline enrollment were randomised (1:1) to receive 8 weeks of either JUUL e-cigarettes or a combination of nicotine patch and lozenge, along with three counseling calls. The primary outcome was biochemically verified 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence (7-day PPA) at 8 weeks. Analyses used an intent-to-treat approach; secondary outcomes included 12-week abstinence, prolonged abstinence, changes in smoking behavior, dependence, and adverse effects. Findings: At 8 weeks, 7-day PPA did not differ significantly between e-cigarette and NRT groups [25 (14.3%) of 175 and 17 (9.7%) of 175, respectively; OR 1.56; 95% CI 0.80-3.04; p = 0.19]. Both groups showed similar reductions in cigarette use and dependence. Adherence to counseling and assigned products was high. Adverse events were generally mild; cough and breathing difficulties were more frequently reported in the e-cigarette group and NRT participants reported more dizziness, sleeplessness, and allergies. Interpretation: Among quitline users with a recent failed quit attempt, e-cigarettes combined with quitline counseling were not more effective than combination NRT in increasing smoking abstinence after 8 weeks' follow-up. Funding: U.S. National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Indexed as

CessationCigarettesElectronic cigarettesQuitlinesSmoking abstinenceTobacco

Identifiers

PMID41551921
PMCPMC12809487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.