ArticleJournal of analytical atomic spectrometry2026
Substrate and standard evaluation for correlative elemental mapping of biological samples by X-ray fluorescence microscopy and laser ablation ICP-MS.
Article in Journal of analytical atomic spectrometry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- On-slide Preparation ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Analytical techniques that offer accurate, sensitive, and high-resolution elemental mapping have significantly advanced our understanding of the role of inorganic chemistry in vital biological processes. Among these, synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence microscopy (XFM) is a particularly powerful tool for providing reliable, non-destructive quantitation of endogenous elements in biological specimens. However, its broader application is constrained by limited beamtime availability. Recent advancements in laboratory-based imaging techniques-such as laser ablation inductively coupled plasma time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-TOF-MS)-have significantly increased the availability and throughput of elemental mapping. Yet, quantitation with LA-ICP-TOF-MS is susceptible to matrix effects, making correlative mapping with XFM critical for validation. This presents a challenge: the two techniques require different sample preparations. LA-ICP-TOF-MS uses glass slides, while XFM requires thin, low-scatter substrates to minimize X-ray background signals. To address this, we evaluated twelve commercially available substrates previously reported for XFM to determine their suitability for LA-ICP-TOF-MS. Our goal was to identify substrates that (1) exhibit low elemental background and minimal interference with quantifying endogenous inorganic species, and (2) are compatible with both imaging modalities. As an initial step, we compared adjacent brain sections prepared on Ultralene (for XFM) and glass (for LA-ICP-TOF-MS) to establish a baseline correlative approach. Building on this, Ultralene, followed by Kapton film, emerged as the most promising candidates for enabling dual XFM and LA-ICP-TOF-MS workflows, offering low background, reliable XFM performance, and demonstrating robust elemental mapping in LA-ICP-TOF-MS. These findings support more accurate and accessible correlative imaging workflows for elemental mapping of biological samples with both modalities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.