ArticleSleep and biological rhythms2026
Assessment of sleep phase, quality, and quantity: the development and validation of the 3-dimensional sleep scale (3DSS).
Article in Sleep and biological rhythms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 3-Dimensional Sleep Scale (3DSS) is used to assess sleep quality, quantity, and phase. However, its reliability and validity were established using classical methods and it has a small validation sample size. We aimed to increase the sample size and update the statistical methods to validate the reliability and validity of the 3DSS. We conducted a web-based survey of approximately 3000 day-shift workers at four companies in Tokyo, Japan, between 2021 and 2022. The 15 questions in the 3DSS were tested for reliability and validity according to the COSMIN checklist. The maximum likelihood method and promax rotation were selected for exploratory factor analysis. Reliability was tested by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient and McDonald's ω reliability coefficient. Convergent and discriminant validity were verified using multi-trait multi-method analysis. Cutoff values were verified using receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC). Existing measures used to validate the validity and cutoff values included the Athens Insomnia Scale, social jetlag, weekday sleep duration, and holiday waking time. Overall 2605 participants were included in the analysis after excluding non-responders, non-consenters, and absent employees. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed a three-factor structure for sleep phase, quality, and quantity. For convergent and discriminant validity, ideal correlations were observed for all subscales. The AUCs for sleep phase, sleep quality, and sleep quantity were 0.747, 0.812, and 0.819, respectively. The 3DSS offers sufficient reliability and validity as a sleep assessment scale. An English version of this scale should be developed in the future. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41105-025-00600-0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.