ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026
Women' and midwives' experiences of perinatal mental health care: A qualitative study.
Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Perinatal mental health problems affect one in five women during pregnancy and the first postpartum year, negatively impacting maternal and infant health. Despite its importance, healthcare remains focused on physical aspects, whereas mental health is neglected, highlighting the need for comprehensive and effective approaches. Aim: To explore the current status of perinatal mental healthcare from the perspective of women and midwives, and to identify needs, challenges, and potential solutions to improve comprehensive care during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Methods: An exploratory qualitative study in which 20 midwives from different care settings and 30 women at different stages of pregnancy and postpartum participated in individual semi-structured interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis assisted by Nvivo12 was used for data analysis. Results: Four main themes emerged from the data analysis: (I) Challenges in Emotional Care: Cultural stigma identified as a significant barrier. Culturally sensitive care and strong therapeutic relationships highlighted as essential for emotional support. Need for dedicated time and safe spaces to facilitate emotional openness. (II) Significance of Perinatal Mental Health: Importance widely recognized but rarely addressed effectively. Mental health closely linked to emotional well-being, yet often neglected in daily practice. (III) Training-related challenges: Midwives report feeling unprepared. Need for ongoing, specific mental health training and standardized assessment tools. (IV) Challenges in Clinical Practice: Absence of clear protocols. High workloads hinder emotional care. Inconsistent approaches contribute to fragmented care. Conclusions: This study highlights key priorities to improve perinatal mental healthcare: including culturally sensitive training, validated and standardised assessment tools, clear clinical protocols, and sufficient time for emotional support. Strengthening therapeutic relationships between midwives and pregnant and postpartum women emerged as essential for effective care. Findings support implementing structured support groups, multidisciplinary collaboration, and a more responsive, holistic care model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.