ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Factors associated with discordant visual and quantitative amyloid PET results.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning for the prediction of amyloid PET positivity using plasma biomarkers, cognition, APOE genotype, and structural imaging.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Factors associated with discordant visual and quantitative amyloid PET results.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFactors underlying discordant visual and quantitative amyloid beta-positron emission tomography (Aβ-PET) results and their clinical implications are not well understood.
methodsParticipants from the 1Florida Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (1FLADRC) underwent Aβ-PET, blood draw, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and neuropsychological testing. We evaluated differences in demographics, apolipoprotein E (
resultsWe studied 386 participants (mean age ± SD: 70.7 ± 7.8, 55.2% female, 44.6% Hispanic White). Compared to V+/Q-, V-/Q+ had a higher frequency of DISCUSSION: Discordant Aβ-PET findings likely hold clinical significance and may reflect early stages of neuropathological progression. Highlights: Groups with concordant/discordant visual-quantitative amyloid beta-positron emission tomography (Aβ-PET) results were compared.Visual-/quant+ were more likely than visual+/quant- to be apolipoprotein E (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.