ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2026
Biliary drainage in patients with altered anatomy: Literature review of different endoscopic approaches.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Common Language for Post-Transplant Anastomotic Biliary Strictures: Standardized Endoscopic Outcome Definitions and a Failure-Mode Roadmap.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- The role of enteroscopy in the diagnosis and interventional management of small intestine diseases.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with surgically altered anatomy remains a challenging field in therapeutic endoscopy due to the complex anatomical reconstructions that limit access to the biliary tree. Over the past two decades, device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE), including single-balloon, double-balloon, and motorized spiral enteroscopy, has expanded the feasibility of ERCP in this population, with overall technical success rates generally reported between 70% and 90%. Nevertheless, these techniques are technically demanding, time-consuming, and frequently affected by limited reach and unstable positioning. More recently, interventional endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided procedures have emerged as highly effective alternatives, significantly improving clinical outcomes in selected patients, particularly in those with long-limb Roux-en-Y reconstructions where conventional methods are less effective. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage continues to represent a valuable salvage option when endoscopic approaches fail, though it is associated with a greater burden of reinterventions and adverse events. This minireview provides a comprehensive overview of the main endoscopic strategies for biliary drainage in altered anatomy, focusing on technical considerations, efficacy, and safety profiles of DAE-assisted ERCP, EUS-guided interventions, and motorized systems. The evolving landscape of biliary drainage in this setting highlights the need for tailored treatment strategies, multidisciplinary collaboration, referral to high-volume centers, and further prospective studies to refine patient selection and optimize clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.