ReviewTranslational and clinical pharmacology2025
Sex differences in efficacy/safety of anti-amyloid-beta monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
Review in Translational and clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia. AD exhibits notable sex-related disparities in prevalence, progression, and treatment response. With the recent approval of anti-amyloid-beta monoclonal antibodies-aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab-understanding sex differences in their clinical effects has become increasingly relevant. This review article investigates sex differences in the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab and discusses the possible mechanism underlying the observed differences. Although sex-specific analyses were largely underreported in clinical trials, population pharmacokinetic models identified sex as a covariate affecting clearance and volume of distribution for aducanumab and lecanemab and higher exposure to lecanemab was predicted for females. Subgroup analyses of phase 3 trials revealed that males tended to experience greater benefit from aducanumab and lecanemab, whereas females showed better response to donanemab. The overall incidence of adverse events, including amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, did not show significant differences between sexes. Potential mechanisms underlying these differences include sex-related variations in blood-brain barrier permeability, apolipoprotein E4-associated neuroinflammatory responses, and baseline disease characteristics. These findings underscore the need for future AD clinical trials to incorporate sex-based analyses and to consider sex as a key factor in optimizing treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.