ArticleJournal of global health reports2024
Should fathers witness childbirth? A survey of attitudes of expectant mothers attending a tertiary hospital in Kano, northern Nigeria.
Article in Journal of global health reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Increased paternal involvement during childbirth can enhance maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, in resource-constrained settings, cultural and health system factors often hinder the involvement of fathers in the birthing process. This study aimed to identify the factors influencing antenatal clients' attitudes towards their partner's presence during childbirth in northern Nigeria. Methods: We administered a pre-tested, culturally adapted questionnaire to antenatal clients at a tertiary health facility (n=351). Attitudinal scores were measured on a Likert scale, and logistic regression was used to compute adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for predictors. Results: Only 15.4% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed with the presence of their male partner during childbirth. Women opposed or strongly opposed the suggestion that their partner's presence provided emotional support (35.9% and 59.8%, respectively), reduced labor pain perception (45.1% and 33.1%, respectively), strengthened the couple's relationship (40.2% and 52.7%, respectively), or enhanced father-child bonding (32.3% and 46.6%, respectively). More than half of the respondents (57.0%) strongly disagreed that their partner's presence enhanced paternal responsibility. Rather, the presence of the partner was considered unhelpful (49.3%), culturally unacceptable (37.9%), and against religious rulings (51.6%). Younger maternal age (<30 years, aOR=7.6, 95% CI=2.12-14.40) and higher parity (≥5 children, aOR=2.08, 95% CI=1.21-8.38) were associated with a more positive attitude towards the presence of the father during labor. Conclusions: Most women did not favor having their partners present during childbirth. Policymakers and healthcare providers should integrate cultural sensitivity considerations into guidelines and initiatives that promote male involvement in childbirth in similar settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.