ArticleAJP reports2026
Associated Factors Relating to the Success of Labor Induction among Pregnant Women Diagnosed with Fetal Intrauterine Growth Restriction: A Retrospective Cohort Study from France.
Article in AJP reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Umbilical Cord Coiling Index With Pregnancy Outcomes in the Second Trimester: A Prospective Observational Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Comparison of Materno-Neonatal Outcomes Between Cook Balloon and Prostaglandin Methods in Labor Induction Among Pregnancies Complicated by Fetal Growth Restriction: A Retrospective Cohort Study from France.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Maternal and Early Neonatal Serum Cytokine and Endothelin-1 Concentrations in Preeclampsia: A Single-Center Observational Cohort Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Fetal Growth Restriction: Contemporary Evidence to Guide Delivery Timing and Intrapartum Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to identify factors related to the successful induction of labor (IOL) among pregnancies complicated with fetal growth restriction (FGR). Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study between January and December 2024 at Orléans University Hospital, Orléans, France. The study enrolled all singleton pregnancies complicated by FGR and underwent IOL. Logistic regression was used to reveal the associated factors relating to the success of IOL, following two criteria, including Bishop score after IOL greater than 7 points (criterion 1) and vaginal birth (criterion 2). Results: Bishop score had a negative correlation with IOL duration. This study did not find statistically significant clinical factors related to the success of the Bishop score change of more than 7 points. However, absence of Doppler abnormalities and IOL at term, more than 37 weeks, were related to the success rate of vaginal delivery (OR [95% CI]: 22.5 [3.240-156.269] and OR [95% CI]: 22.5 [3.240-156.269], respectively; Conclusion: Bishop score before IOL helps in reducing the duration of IOL. In FGR pregnancies with a normal Doppler ultrasound scan and gestational age at IOL greater than 37 weeks, these are good prognostic factors for vaginal delivery; however, further research is needed to explore more associated factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.